Flying RC: Deeper Dives
-
State of the Hobby News-AMA-FCC doings etc.
-
Operating the Sticks; Options to Consider
-
Adjusting the Transmitter Feel
-
Control Reversal
FCC Public Notice DA 25-1086On
Monday, December 22, 2025,
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released DA 25-1086, stating the addition of all uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) and UAS components produced by foreign entities onto the list of items banned for posing an “unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States or the security and safety of United States persons.” This concerning news reached AMA and other airspace stakeholders quickly after its release. It appears that this prohibition does not affect existing UAS or UAS components that have already been authorized prior to December 21 or outlaw their use.
However, because virtually all model components are manufactured abroad, this security restriction would have huge implications for both the hobbyist and commercial airspace industries moving forward. It should be noted that this determination was made on December 21 and released to the public on December 22, leaving airspace industry stakeholders without any warning.
AMA had previously submitted public comments in early March to the Bureau of Industry and Security that were related to this topic, giving multiple recommendations to ease restrictions on the hobbyist community. However, the FCC and the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (PSHSB) have made this determination through pre-existing mechanics in the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act, side-stepping the typical public comment period and advanced notice that stakeholders would usually receive.
The AMA has already begun engaging with the FCC and congressional offices to address this issue, alongside other industry stakeholders who have fought against broad component bans and advocated for definition changes to the generic use of “UAS” to give relief to recreational modelers from similar security enforcements and regulations. We expect that the timing of this release was intentional because all congressional offices are closed for the holidays, and many federal agency employees are taking time off.
The document indicates a possible pathway for exemption or other authorized relief, but no major updates will be expected until the new year. AMA will keep members updated on all developments about this topic as we gain new information. To remain current with the most recent government-related news, regularly visit the AMA Government Affairs blog.
If you have questions or concerns, contact the Government Affairs department at (765) 287-1256, or amagov@modelaircraft.org.FCC Link: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-1086A1.pdf
Information from the Albuquerque Radio Control Club and AMA.
Grasping the Stick.
Did you know there are two popular ways to grasp the controller sticks? The videos below discuss two common methods. Which one is best for you?
1. The most popular style, thumb on top of the stick, seems like the most natural position. The pilot places the thumb on the top of the stick and relies on the flexibility of thumb action to move the stick precisely in any direction. The advantage of this style is faster stick movement and the ability to move the stick rapidly to its extreme right-left or up-down travel stops.
The disadvantage is that it can make it more difficult to fly the plane with precision. Why? Because when learning to fly, it can be hard to sense when the stick is in the center or neutral position. Performing precise and beautiful aerobatic maneuvers often requires the stick to be moved precisely horizontally or vertically moving the plane in only one axis at a time. It takes practice. Yes, some maneuvers require the stick to be moved in a diagonal to produce two- or even three-axis movement.
2. Using the thumb and index finger method, the pilot places the tip of the thumb on the grip below the top of the stick bottom and places the bottom of the index finger on the top side of the grip. This positioning means that the stick is held securely and movement is sensed by thumb and finger sensors.
The advantage of the thumb-squeeze method is that the pilot is more likely to feel the motion and position of the stick while flying. After experimentation, I found that using the thumb only on the left stick for quicker and wider (rudder and throttle) adjustments and the thumb and index finger on the right stick (aileron and elevator) gave me the easiest and most precise control of the airplane.
Customize your radio feel.
1. Improve your flying by customizing the stick length to suit your reach.
2. The spring tension on your sticks can usually be adjusted. Beginner pilots may find a stronger tension setting is better.
Moving the Sticks; Options
The first and most popular is a continuous push-pull motion using a thumb on the top of the stick. The advantage of this style is realizing faster stick movements and obtaining a better ability to rapidly move the stick to its extreme right-left or up-down travel stop.
The disadvantage is that it makes over-controlling your plane more likely for beginners. Also, the stick position and movement direction as sensed by the thumbs only making a single point of contact with the stick makes it very difficult to precisely know the exact direction and distance you are moving the stick as you fly. Precise stick movement is essential to feeling in control of your airplane.
Using an index finger-thumb squeeze on the stick, the pilot bumps the stick in the proper direction to provide a flight control input to the airplane.
The advantage to the squeeze and bump method is that smaller corrective inputs are sent to the aircraft and the pilot has more time to react and add more bumps or an opposite-direction stick bump when needed to guide an aircraft safely and precisely.
Better Banking by Bumping
Not talking here about 3D flying. But recommending that novice RC flyers learning to fly, try the bump method of sending the airplane small commands.
Wiring the Brain for the "RC Reversal Conundrum"
RC Learning Rule, #1; Drive first, fly later. Why? There is one control skill that is absolutely essential to being successful from the get-go in RC operation. That is sending the vehicle correct directional control commands, whether the airplane or ground vehicle is traveling toward you or it'si moving away from you.
Beginning pilots must understand this apparent control reversal from the first flight onwards. One way to learn apparent directional reversal control quickly and easily is to drive an RC car before your first flight. When you are proficient at driving straight away turning and then coming back toward you, then first RC flight will be easier and more successful.
If you do not have access to an RC vehicle, it will work just as well to practice taxing your airplane away and toward you. In learning how to takeoff an airplane you must command the plane to move on the path you desire.
To help avoid the confusion of control reversal, face parallel and in the direction the plane is flying.
One more tip to help with "Reversal". Try rotating your body while operating the RC controller in such a way that you face parallel and in the direction the plane is flying. This means that when the plane is flying toward you, you are standing in such a way that you rotate your neck and look back at the airplane as it moves toward you.
When it passes by, maintain your body stance and rotate your head to see where the plane is now going. Rotating your head not your body will mean that left and right commands will make sense.
If you stand with your body facing toward an oncoming plane, the right and left command movement of the transmitter stick will seem reversed and may be quite confusing for a while until your brain learns to make the correct stick movement automatically.
Ever wonder what the fingers are doing on the control box to fly 3D maneuvers? Click the orange link below to see a YouTube video posted by Precision Aerobatics that gives you a good idea. Happy Flying!
The Story of Phil Benedict
x
Phil Benedict, of Gardnerville, NV*, has quite an imagination, a dogged creativity, and the ability to create variations of Aeroscouts you’d never think possible. What Phil has done you can construct yourself and end up with the coolest RC in your club.
One night, when Phil should have been sleeping, he was instead thinking of flying … Aeroscouts in particular. He wondered if he could bind more than one Aeroscout with the same standard transmitter that comes with any Aeroscout.
Then he wondered if you could control multiple Aeroscouts and a Carbon Cub bound to the same transmitter and have all RC’s respond to the same signals in sync.
So he put 3 Aeroscouts and a Carbon Cub on the bench, bound them all to the same standard transmitter, attached batteries to each and hit the rudder control on the transmitter. They all wagged their tails in unison. Then the ailerons, etc. He says it was like watching a group of synchronized swimmers.
So what the hell. He attached 3 blade props and without particularly using math, or engineering, Phil embarked on gluing two Aeroscouts together to see if he could fly them as a single unit with one transmitter. He used eyeballing and intuition and came up with a dual Aeroscout** It flys fast and solid and looks like this (notice the decals even line up):
Phil kept going. (Phil spends a lot of time in the shop). He had leftover wing pieces from his dual Aeroscout and attached them, staggered, to the bottom of yet another Aeroscout and wound up with a bi-plane Aeroscout. He had to pay extra attention to the incidence of the two wings but once lined up that one flew fine too. He calls this one his Bi-Polar Aeroscout.
Phil kept going. (Can you tell Phil’s retired?) Phil replaced the motor on an Aeroscout and replaced it with a ducted fan motor - much faster than the original and requiring more ventilation. This one needed extra ventilation and a 4S battery.
Phil kept going. (Phil needs to cut back on his coffee) He joined another two Aeroscouts together and replaced both motors with electric ducted fan motors ending up with a super fast dual fan jet. And it sounds like a fan jet. That one gets a little hot so extra ventilation was required and 4S batteries.
Phil kept going. (Do you think meditation would help Phil?) Next he added another Aeroscout motor to the nose of a standard Aeroscout and ended up with a ‘push me, pull me’ Aeroscout with motors fore and aft. This one requires 2 receivers and 2 ESCs. Both motors and props rotate in the same direction.
Phil kept going. (Anything worth doing is worth overdoing) Phil next designed a tail dragger version of an Aeroscout. Kind of a bush plane with the addition of the balloon wheels. Makes a difference in take off because of the altered wing incidence with the lowered tail. It looks like this:
Phil kept going. (What’s Phil going to do when he runs out of Aeroscouts?) (There’s no end to his imagination). He put snow skis on an Aeroscout too.
So what’s next for Phil? A four engine Aeroscout. Stay tuned.
His favorite movie is Flight of the Phoenix, has been RC flying since 1979 and was an early AMA member. He flew mostly stick built nitro planes. He was a regular member of the Hemet, CA Model Masters for 7 years, and an instructor. But life got in the way and he left RC flying for 30 years.
In 2023 he stopped by the flying field of the Sierra Sagebrush Flyers RC Club in Gardnerville, NV and joined. The AMA even found his membership number and restored it to Phil. He needed and RC airplane to fly and bought ….. no, not an Aeroscout but a glider that he hasn’t flown yet. Then a Carbon Cub. Then an Aeroscout. He says the Aeroscout was cheap and ready to fly.
Phil says your reflexes decline over the years and you can’t pick up where you left off. But the ‘safe’ function sometimes found in today’s RC’s helps you safely pick up the hobby … again. He’s got another one ordered and on the way and has a record of 9 surviving Aeroscouts out of 10 purchased.
**Phil put 2 Aeroscout fuselages on the bench and measured the wing from the center point and found that the center piece, the wing area between the two fuselages, would have to be 9 inches (he calls it ‘the magic number). That was all the wing length he could take without impinging on the ailerons. He joined the landing gear of the two fuselages by flattening out two of the landing gear pieces, laying them on top of one another, and bolting them together. Notice there are 4 wheels.
The dual Aeroscout can be fully restored to two separate aircraft by removing the center wing piece and the joinder for the landing gear. Phil did add one ‘non standard’ part to the dual Aeroscout - an extra length spar (18 inches) that spans from the left wing, through the middle wing, and into the right wing.
When Phil finished the first altered Aeroscout - the dual Aeroscout - the center of gravity was perfect and the first lap around the field was straight and level with hands off.
One night, when Phil should have been sleeping, he was instead thinking of flying … Aeroscouts in particular. He wondered if he could bind more than one Aeroscout with the same standard transmitter that comes with any Aeroscout.
Then he wondered if you could control multiple Aeroscouts and a Carbon Cub bound to the same transmitter and have all RC’s respond to the same signals in sync.
So he put 3 Aeroscouts and a Carbon Cub on the bench, bound them all to the same standard transmitter, attached batteries to each and hit the rudder control on the transmitter. They all wagged their tails in unison. Then the ailerons, etc. He says it was like watching a group of synchronized swimmers.
So what the hell. He attached 3 blade props and without particularly using math, or engineering, Phil embarked on gluing two Aeroscouts together to see if he could fly them as a single unit with one transmitter. He used eyeballing and intuition and came up with a dual Aeroscout** It flys fast and solid and looks like this (notice the decals even line up):
Phil kept going. (Phil spends a lot of time in the shop). He had leftover wing pieces from his dual Aeroscout and attached them, staggered, to the bottom of yet another Aeroscout and wound up with a bi-plane Aeroscout. He had to pay extra attention to the incidence of the two wings but once lined up that one flew fine too. He calls this one his Bi-Polar Aeroscout.
Phil kept going. (Can you tell Phil’s retired?) Phil replaced the motor on an Aeroscout and replaced it with a ducted fan motor - much faster than the original and requiring more ventilation. This one needed extra ventilation and a 4S battery.
Phil kept going. (Phil needs to cut back on his coffee) He joined another two Aeroscouts together and replaced both motors with electric ducted fan motors ending up with a super fast dual fan jet. And it sounds like a fan jet. That one gets a little hot so extra ventilation was required and 4S batteries.
Phil kept going. (Do you think meditation would help Phil?) Next he added another Aeroscout motor to the nose of a standard Aeroscout and ended up with a ‘push me, pull me’ Aeroscout with motors fore and aft. This one requires 2 receivers and 2 ESCs. Both motors and props rotate in the same direction.
Phil kept going. (Anything worth doing is worth overdoing) Phil next designed a tail dragger version of an Aeroscout. Kind of a bush plane with the addition of the balloon wheels. Makes a difference in take off because of the altered wing incidence with the lowered tail. It looks like this:
Phil kept going. (What’s Phil going to do when he runs out of Aeroscouts?) He put pontoons on an Aeroscout and that looks like this:
Phil kept going. (There’s no end to his imagination). He put snow skis on an Aeroscout and it looks like this:
So what’s next for Phil? A four engine Aeroscout. Stay tuned.
*Phil Benedict, whose favorite movie is Flight of the Phoenix, has been RC flying since 1979 and was an early AMA member. He flew mostly stick built nitro planes. He was a regular member of the Hemet, CA Model Masters for 7 years, and an instructor. But life got in the way and he left RC flying for 30 years.
In 2023 he stopped by the flying field of the Sierra Sagebrush Flyers RC Club in Gardnerville, NV and joined. The AMA even found his membership number and restored it to Phil. He needed and RC airplane to fly and bought ….. no, not an Aeroscout but a glider that he hasn’t flown yet. Then a Carbon Cub. Then an Aeroscout. He says the Aeroscout was cheap and ready to fly.
Phil says your reflexes decline over the years and you can’t pick up where you left off. But the ‘safe’ function sometimes found in today’s RC’s helps you safely pick up the hobby … again. He’s got another one ordered and on the way and has a record of 9 surviving Aeroscouts out of 10 purchased.
Phil put 2 Aeroscout fuselages on the bench and measured the wing from the center point and found that the center piece, the wing area between the two fuselages, would have to be 9 inches (he calls it ‘the magic number). That was all the wing length he could take without impinging on the ailerons. He joined the landing gear of the two fuselages by flattening out two of the landing gear pieces, laying them on top of one another, and bolting them together. Notice there are 4 wheels.
The dual Aeroscout can be fully restored to two separate aircraft by removing the center wing piece and the joinder for the landing gear. Phil did add one ‘non standard’ part to the dual Aeroscout - an extra length spar (18 inches) that spans from the left wing, through the middle wing, and into the right wing.
When Phil finished the first altered Aeroscout - the dual Aeroscout - the center of gravity was perfect and the first lap around the field was straight and level with hands off.
